No Widgets found in the Sidebar

(Note: Pakistan has similar or better Capability missiles compare to BrahMos)

 Introduction

Jointly developed, marketed and produced by Russia and India, the BrahMos is a supersonic anti-ship cruising missile (ASCM). Weighing 2,500 kg and with an engagement range of 450 km, the Brahmos is one of India’s mainstay stand-off range weapons. India can deploy the BrahMos from surface warships and land, aircraft and submarines, making this ASCM a versatile asset  and for Pakistan, a credible threat.

Simply put, the BrahMos confers India the ability to:

 (1) engage time-sensitive targets (TST)  e.g. moving ships or vehicles  by leveraging a near Mach 3 cruising speed (i.e. around 3,700 km/h, a standard subsonic ASCM flies at one-third this speed or less) and

 (2) heavily pressure surface ship and land-based point air defence systems and require the defending side to expand its missile-counter umbrella.

Both factors are relevant to Pakistan: the dissemination of the BrahMos within each of India’s service arms (i.e. Army, Air Force and Navy) will put Pakistan’s surface-based delivery platforms (e.g. fast attack crafts and land-based missile launchers) and other high-value targets  e.g. infrastructure  under threat.

There is also the commercial advantage of possessing a scarcely available product in a supersonic ASCM, especially one capable of sustaining that flight speed for the duration of its flight.

While not relevant to Pakistan from a threat-perception aspect, the proliferation of the BrahMos  and its analogous counterparts  will provide potent anti-access and area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities to countries that the Indians and Russians are willing to sell, e.g. Southeast Asian, Middle East and African militaries.

However, for Pakistan the relevant issue is that the BrahMos requires each of Pakistan’s service arms to

 (1) develop or acquire adequate defensibility measures and

(2) consider acquiring analogous capabilities (i.e. their own supersonic cruising missile platform) to help support its conventional deterrence profile.

Unfortunately, there are limitations – even on the market in general (much less Pakistan’s fiscal limitations) – which will show that “countering” the BrahMos may be an unreasonable expectation from a defensibility standpoint. The emphasis may be placed on acquiring an analogous solution in an effort to shore-up conventional deterrence.

Background

The BrahMos was born from India’s pursuit of a next-generation cruise missile from 1983, when India had initiated the Integrated Guided Missile Development Programme (IGMDP). [1] The US-Iraq War of the early 1990s gave additional momentum to the IGMDP, prompting India to consult its partner Russia for support.

The BrahMos is a product of BrahMos Aerospace, a joint-venture involving Russia’s NPO Mashinostroyenia (NPOM) and India’s Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) formed in 1998 with a joint-investment of $250 million U.S. In terms of equity, NPOM and DRDO own 49.5% and 50.5% of BrahMos Aerospace, respectively. [2] According to BrahMos Aerospace, DRDO contributed its experience in producing “inertial navigation systems, mission software [and] mobile launchers” while NPOM brought its expertise in “ramjet engines together with a number of technologies for space systems. “

BrahMos Aerospace conducted the first successful test-firing of the BrahMos ASCM in 2001 from a land-based launcher at India’s Integrated Test Range in Orissa.

Like other cruise missiles, the BrahMos ASCM utilizes an air-breathing engine, but to enable its supersonic cruising speed, it uses a ramjet engine instead of a miniature turbojet engine (as commonly found on subsonic ASCM such as the Harpoon and Exocet).

Defensibility

The BrahMos’ ability to cruise at supersonic speed presents two challenges: First, it reduces the reaction time available to Pakistan’s defensive systems,

Analogous Capability

Although there are reports of Pakistan also possessing the CM-400AKG, neither it nor any of Pakistan’s other AShM/LACM are supersonic cruising (i.e. sustain supersonic flight for the duration of the flight).

Conclusion

Unfortunately, while shoring up defensibility through PDMS and trying to match the BrahMos with an analogous supersonic cruising missile are essentially the only near-term options available, Pakistan is bound by its fiscal realities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.